Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 14:05
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 635
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 9.7
18% 28.3 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 24.6
22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 133 135 136 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 359
Write 155
Mixed 194
SusWrite 135
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 22.2
84% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 116
91% 130 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 88%
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
60GB free
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 167 167 166 163 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 249
Write 166
Mixed 129
SusWrite 164
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 13.8
48% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 51.2
DQ Mixed 71.7
59% 86 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39%
Great: 51%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
15GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 80 84 80 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 154
Write 99.4
Mixed 108
SusWrite 80.9
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 20.1
70% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 91.7
66% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
22GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 484
Write 460
Mixed 414
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 15.4
91% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 67
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 118
88% 113 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
105GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 34 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 36.2
40% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 38.4
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 29.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 1R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 35% 17 110 76 60 27" 2560 1440 MSI1462 Optix MAG27CQ
Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $451
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback