PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z640 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212A |
Memory | 49.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150722 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 03 '21 at 12:01 |
Run Duration | 218 Seconds |
Run User | ARE-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M2000
HP(103C 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
|
21.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
LK0800GEYMU 800GB
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4IWTHPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 399 399 400 399 395 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 194 197 194 195 200 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
19GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.4 8.5 8.9 8.4 8.4 MB/s
|
5.48%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
61.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 17% | 18 | 59 | 4 | 60 | 31.5" | 2560 1440 | SAM0F96 U32R59x |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 113x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 100x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 97x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 146x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 115x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 62x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $509 |