Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2955U 542 User benchmarks, average bench 37% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 79 1-Core 37.4 2-Core 75.2 43% 63.9 Pts	4-Core 75.9 8-Core 76.1 10% 76 Pts	64-Core 71.8 4% 71.8 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 0A06) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.27 Parallax 2.94 2% 2.74 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SBe M2 SSD 120GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1862 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 887 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 27 (AD) Unknown 100 100 24379466 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 52 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4294761	29% Poor	Read 316 Write 44.8 Mixed 118 34% 159 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 4.29 41% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 45.5 DQ Write 51.3 DQ Mixed 0.91 14% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB 3,854 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DRAM clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	25.9% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 0.8 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 82.4 49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16