Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH551
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '21 at 01:04
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 135 2-Core 256 91% 161 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 722 68% 567 Pts	64-Core 974 60% 974 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q) 3,436 User benchmarks, average bench 93% Device(1A58 2009) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.6% Very good	Lighting 97.3 Reflection 127 Parallax 70.9 79% 98.3 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 60.1 Splatting 52.7 60% 76.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 106%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 254% 556GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1405 1173 1136 1119 1094 1051 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	269% Outstanding	Read 2,086 Write 1,780 Mixed 1,575 SusWrite 1163 370% 1,651 MB/s	4K Read 59.4 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 76.6 250% 84.2 MB/s	DQ Read 917 DQ Write 728 DQ Mixed 830 619% 825 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 269% Great: 329%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 23.8 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 38.3 SC Mixed 26.4 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 59: 7R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
59%	50%	42	307	231	300	15.5"	1920 1080	AUODE8E

History: Score 39: 4R 3G 10B | Score 59: 7R 5G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	1,302x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	504x
RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 93%, 3,436 samples	396x
RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 86%, 3,561 samples	379x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	311x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	202x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	148x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	651x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	172x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16