PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D2991-A1 |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120402 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 07 '21 at 16:48 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
65.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B E101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
|
4.52%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 173 128 115 112 98 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
320GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 218 220 217 220 218 MB/s
|
123%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$75
9GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 102 98 110 101 107 MB/s
|
59.7%
Above average
|
|||
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 750GB
232GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.1 9.1 9 9.1 9 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 240GB
88GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.1 9.1 9 9.1 9 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
213GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.6 9.2 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
12.6%
Very poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 60 | 22" | 1280 720 | HWP2848 LA2205 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 33x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 31x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 27x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |