Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 134% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 12:46
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 96.8 1-Core 156 2-Core 307 102% 187 Pts	4-Core 608 8-Core 944 96% 776 Pts	64-Core 1,262 78% 1,262 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3752) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 171 Reflection 194 Parallax 182 139% 182 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 185 Splatting 130 122% 151 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 537 279 280 285 283 281 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 2,092 Write 930 Mixed 467 SusWrite 324 208% 953 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 31.9 129% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,063 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 116 205% 431 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 442GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 461 465 466 452 295 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 485 Mixed 466 SusWrite 429 107% 474 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 54.8 181% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 362 273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 557GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 462 465 467 465 468 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 483 Mixed 436 SusWrite 461 107% 473 MB/s	4K Read 48.4 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 59.1 192% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 362 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%
Corsair Force 3 60GB 4,789 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 21GB free Firmware: 5.05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 67 66 67 65 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 183 Write 72.2 Mixed 106 SusWrite 66.8 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 28.9 118% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 71.8 DQ Mixed 81.2 67% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 187 188 189 187 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 130 Mixed 74 SusWrite 186 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: 0739 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 172 174 173 174 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 127 Mixed 75 SusWrite 171 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$190 7,103 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 31.2 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.4 SC Write 45.4 SC Mixed 32.2 97% 34 GB/s	Latency 50.9 78% 50.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 14: 2R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
14%	18%	34	112	8	100	34.1"	3440 1440	ACR0450 Acer X34

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,422x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	670x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	270x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	363x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	314x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	105x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	99x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	93x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	92x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16