Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 12:27
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 668
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 805 815 820 823 840 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,500
Write 2,235
Mixed 1,800
SusWrite 859
413% 1,849 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 73.2
238% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 409
DQ Mixed 606
449% 601 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 254%
Great: 355%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
452GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 454 452 450 451 396 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 450
Mixed 437
SusWrite 442
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 44.6
148% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 294
241% 344 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
275GB free
Firmware: 04.04V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 116 116 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 124
Write 123
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 116
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 29.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 25
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3545 HP 24f
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback