bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardEVGA EVGA P55 SLI E655
Memory3.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110503
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '21 at 23:08
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 116
55% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 291
28% 232 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.7% Above average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 60
52% 63.1 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 62.1
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD320 256GB-$419
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 23 51 49 50 45 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 112
Write 165
Mixed 124
SusWrite 48.8
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 23.8
78% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 32.5
29% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
537GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 41 75 68 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 149
Write 149
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 66.1
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2G4
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback