Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 07:48
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Memory 32.8
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 59.5
24% 39.4 Pts
4-Core 78.6
8-Core 83.5
11% 81.1 Pts
64-Core 67.8
5% 67.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1315) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.4
3% 5.07 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6.3
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 47 75 31 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.2% Poor
Read 84.7
Write 73.2
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 62
15% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 3.3
42% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 51
DQ Mixed 65
58% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB-$40
72GB free
Firmware: SB2OC7KP
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.5
Mixed 12.9
6% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
2,323% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 25%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 9.9
Write 12.9
Mixed 9.1
SusWrite 27.3
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.2 7.5 8.8 7.5 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 5
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 8
12% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
16% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PBA 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 0.6
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2D C24F390
Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 2,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $23
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $245Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback