Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Blade Shadow Computer (all builds)
Motherboard	Blade ShadowM
Memory	6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190103
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 7,521 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 71.4 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 159 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 488 48% 391 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000 8,562 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 453.10 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.2% Very good	Lighting 95.5 Reflection 116 Parallax 104 78% 105 fps	MRender 46.1 Gravity 102 Splatting 100 70% 82.6 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 101%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB 1,797 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 22 15 15 30 22 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 595 Mixed 512 SusWrite 29.3 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 62.3 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 53.3 189% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 444 DQ Write 393 DQ Mixed 430 319% 422 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Blade 3DP9SE8IO57GOM-O8O 1x12GB 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	107% Outstanding	MC Read 45.5 MC Write 41.8 MC Mixed 42.7 124% 43.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 43: 5R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
43%	65%	23	236	99	75	0"	1280 1024	BLD0101 FPD2275W

History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 22: 3R 1G 4B | Score 43: 5R 4G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 61%, 7,521 samples	415x
Xeon E5-2667 v3IntelBench 64%, 2,246 samples	147x
EPYC 7543P 32-CoreAMDBench 71%, 974 samples	24x

GPU
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	297x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	256x
RTX A4500NvidiaBench 146%, 1,594 samples	24x

SSD
HARDDISK 275GBQemuBench 89%, 1,797 samples	570x
HARDDISK 825GBQemuBench 88%, 37 samples	21x
HARDDISK 1.5TBQemuBench 75%, 3 samples	1x

RAM
282DEW7CTQ0QH4-0V7 1x12GBBladeBench 97%, 3 samples	3x
2UUHX2E3U314TS-2WF 1x12GBBladeBench 59%, 3 samples	2x
YN1J8O05X3T5EC-468 1x12GBBladeBench 60%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16