HP 315eu

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 315eu (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AAF
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100423
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 220 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 70.4 1-Core 40.5 2-Core 68 40% 59.6 Pts	4-Core 78.7 8-Core 77.9 10% 78.3 Pts	64-Core 74.4 5% 74.4 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 5360) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.8 4% 4.5 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 141 159 161 108 130 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49% Average	Read 240 Write 216 Mixed 191 SusWrite 142 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 25.3 78% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 141 104% 138 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 114%
WD Re 2TB-$28 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 02.00M.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 84 84 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 105 Write 89.7 Mixed 71.9 SusWrite 81.5 64% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 83%
BUFFALO USB Flash Disk 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 0114 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.3 7.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.53% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 6.3 Mixed 5 SusWrite 6.9 10% 8.18 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP497157-D88-ELDWG 99U5458-005.A01LF 6GB 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.5% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 9 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 32: 4R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
32%	10%	100	37	17	70	0"	1920 1080	Default

History: Score 35: 5R 2G 4B | Score 32: 4R 3G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 315eu Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: HP 315eu

CPU
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	5x
Athlon II X2 245AMDBench 41%, 6,247 samples	4x
Athlon II X2 215AMD $29Bench 38%, 4,513 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	10x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	2x
870 EVO 500G 500GBSamsungBench 88%, 499 samples	1x
CS90 0 480GB SSDPNYBench 68%, 114 samples	1x

RAM
8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 1x2GBMicronBench 24%, 225 samples	2x
PSD34G160081 1x4GBPatriotBench 26%, 818 samples	1x
16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 2x2GBMicronBench 33%, 498 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16