Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 253%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory35.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 16:37
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 71.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
97% 185 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,230
111% 935 Pts
64-Core 2715
168% 2715 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 323
Reflection 300
Parallax 353
263% 325 fps
MRender 359
Gravity 261
Splatting 193
213% 271 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 217%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: STOSC014 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2708 2767 2787 2782 2772 2783 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 1,865
Write 2,639
Mixed 1,966
SusWrite 2,766
524% 2,309 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 81.4
285% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,087
DQ Mixed 1,226
915% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 386%
Great: 385%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132
572GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 442 438 428 439 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 430
Mixed 389
SusWrite 438
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 48.4
161% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 183
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
372GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 456 289 244 247 250 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 422
Write 445
Mixed 378
SusWrite 324
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 38.2
133% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$102
252GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 389 460 376 411 361 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 441
Mixed 342
SusWrite 402
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 42
147% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 196
148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 120%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 112 112 110 114 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 111
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 158 159 164 166 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 97
Write 141
Mixed 63
SusWrite 160
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 174 178 175 183 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 135
Write 101
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 175
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 105%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
427GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 86 89 91 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 36.7
Write 84.2
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 89.3
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 68%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 5TB
584GB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 70 70 71 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 89.7
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 69.2
103% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 60%
StoreJet Transcend 4TB
841GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 83 81 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 76.9
Write 82
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 81.5
100% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.8
241% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 65%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
164GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 73 75 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 82.1
Write 83.2
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 75.5
97% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G3E1 Crucial BL16G26C16U4B.16FD 16ATF2G64AZ-2G3E1 Crucial BL16G26C16U4B.16FD 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
MC Read 62.6
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 23.9
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 30.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 3R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 22% 45 210 18 60 27" 2560 1440 BNQ8024 BenQ LCD
Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,258
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback