Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 14:19
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 50.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
81% 158 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 898
88% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,953
121% 1,953 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.9% Good
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 127
Parallax 58.7
53% 83.6 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 127
Splatting 109
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 331 324 234 253 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 324
Write 251
Mixed 279
SusWrite 279
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 31.2
108% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 198
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
314GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 367 349 236 255 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 273
Write 259
Mixed 240
SusWrite 292
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 27.1
90% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 152
125% 178 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 126%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
941GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 68 66 68 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 74.3
Write 73.9
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 66.5
54% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 16.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 11% 27 108 5 60 24.1" 1920 1200 BNQ7F67 BenQ SW240
History: Score 12: 1R 1G 4B | Score 7: 1R 0G 2B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,493
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback