Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210616
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 6,798 User benchmarks, average bench 80% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 63 1-Core 151 2-Core 276 87% 163 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 760 81% 647 Pts	64-Core 1,046 65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% PNY(196E 119F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.1% Above average	Lighting 61.4 Reflection 68 Parallax 61.7 50% 63.7 fps	MRender 63.4 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 62.8 53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,509 Write 1,660 Mixed 1,287 332% 1,486 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 71.9 254% 96.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,334 DQ Write 1,072 DQ Mixed 1,193 896% 1200 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 31 35 40 30 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 108%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.9 6.9 7.1 7.5 6.9 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Read 10.4 Write 8.2 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 6.6 6% 8.72 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 113%
Innostor Ext. HDD 1TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 172GB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 19 Mixed 17 SusWrite 19 25% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 31.6 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 25.1 78% 27.3 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 5R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	17%	66	106	5	60	24.5"	1920 1080	IVM6132 PL2530H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	484x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD $210Bench 84%, 294,959 samples	160x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	92x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	88x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	46x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 33: 5R 1G 5B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)