HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cc0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cc0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8364
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180223
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '21 at 13:29
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4415U 6,525 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 133 58% 95 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 185 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610 9,913 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8364) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.03 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 326GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 23 56 83 89 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 23 23 23 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 35.8 Write 39 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 22.5 25% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.6 178% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 800 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 194GB free, PID a20c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 19 20 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 33.7 Write 35 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 19.5 36% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 1x8GB 1,938 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	38% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.4 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15DB

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cc0xx Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cc0xx

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	192x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	166x
Core i3-7100UIntelBench 43%, 37,239 samples	16x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	335x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	49x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	8x

SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 5,596 samples	8x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	7x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBSamsungBench 51%, 4,998 samples	63x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	40x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16