Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_F509JB

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_F509JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JB
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210112
Uptime	29.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '21 at 23:56
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	28%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 126 56% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 290 31% 249 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX110 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 183F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6231 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.61% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 7.7 6% 8.57 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 8.2 8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.61% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GB 2,132 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 512 483 456 436 445 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 676 Write 444 Mixed 603 SusWrite 474 123% 549 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 37 134% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 564 DQ Write 374 DQ Mixed 324 281% 420 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 210%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 6,259 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	67.6% Good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 21.4 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 57: 6R 9G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
57%	14%	106	111	69	60	15.5"	1536 864	CMN15F5

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 2: 0R 0G 2B | Score 37: 4R 5G 2B | Score 57: 6R 9G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_F509JB Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_F509JB

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	16x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	12x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	11x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	9x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	8x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	16x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	8x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	17x
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	6x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 59%, 5,397 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16