Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '21 at 16:58
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 66.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 235 76% 140 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 590 58% 474 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M 5 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Lighting 88.7 Reflection 120 Parallax 79.4 72% 96 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 78.8 Splatting 72.2 66% 81.8 fps
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 261GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 955 979 995 998 930 639 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1098 Write 1,007 Mixed 1,022 SusWrite 916 228% 1,011 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 53.4 171% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 464 DQ Write 682 DQ Mixed 610 451% 585 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 181%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 236GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 122 125 122 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 90.4 Write 58.9 Mixed 94.9 SusWrite 119 68% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.7 177% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 1x16GB 6,167 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 1R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	26%	27	322	253	120	15.5"	1536 864	AUOD0ED

History: Score 41: 4R 6G 3B | Score 17: 1R 3G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	493x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	301x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16