Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 38% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 27.6 2-Core 56.8 36% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 54.3 8-Core 63.2 8% 58.8 Pts	64-Core 63.8 4% 63.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 902D) 384MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.2 Parallax 0.8 1% 0.6 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.3 0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 90 54 8.7 47 87 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.8% Below average	Read 210 Write 190 Mixed 159 SusWrite 67.1 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 13.6 52% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 51.1 DQ Write 58.7 DQ Mixed 27.6 28% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16