Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512JP
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '21 at 14:43
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 122 2-Core 190 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 412 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	6.85% Terrible	Lighting 9.5 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 4.7 8% 10 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 11.2 Splatting 0.2 5% 7.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.85% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB 3,002 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 307 268 253 248 235 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 785 Write 817 Mixed 838 SusWrite 279 153% 680 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 23.7 75% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 735 DQ Write 592 DQ Mixed 648 489% 658 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 179%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 880GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 107 108 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 124 Write 94.1 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 105 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.2% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 24.5 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 22.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 13: 2R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
13%	3%	90	25	4	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP0046

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	24x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	9x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	17x
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	8x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	8x

SSD
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	16x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 256GBNvmeBench 147%, 1,127 samples	3x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	2x

RAM
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GBHynixBench 72%, 222 samples	9x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 1,684 samples	6x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 68%, 575 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16