Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6300-$44 3,672 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 115 2-Core 201 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 306 41% 305 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Zotac(19DA 1143) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	3.64% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 2.6 4% 2.9 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 2 Splatting 0.8 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.64% Great: 5%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 60GB-$56 675 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: C4 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 313 Write 107 Mixed 133 40% 184 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 84.3 4K Mixed 35.9 109% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 90.9 78% 115 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 79%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 122GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 65 74 71 73 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive	Read 90.8 Write 69.2 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 69.8 56% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AQ2400D4A 1x4GB 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.8% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	70	0"	1280 720	Default

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16