Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer OL510
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '21 at 10:44
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 206 67% 120 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 513 55% 437 Pts	64-Core 610 38% 610 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 200D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 30 Parallax 6.8 5% 14.1 fps	MRender 9.6 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 9.2 7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 138 134 130 130 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 654 Write 126 Mixed 258 SusWrite 131 64% 292 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 30.7 98% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 157 123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 169%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 760GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 1068 1162 1252 1131 1163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 977 Write 1,114 Mixed 1,008 SusWrite 1,138 240% 1,059 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 49.5 161% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 717 DQ Write 438 DQ Mixed 673 476% 609 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 347%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 23 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 17.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 28: 3R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
28%	20%	40	26	5	120	15.5"	1536 864	AUOD0ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	453x
Core i7-4770KIntelBench 88%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	210x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	82x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GBSamsungBench 118%, 136 samples	63x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 261 samples	204x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	181x
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GBKingstonBench 88%, 1,552 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16