Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 64.5 1-Core 128 2-Core 253 79% 149 Pts	4-Core 518 8-Core 495 68% 506 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Lighting 67.5 Reflection 69 Parallax 63.6 55% 66.7 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 64.3 54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 132 176 215 232 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 125 Write 338 Mixed 177 SusWrite 173 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 28.9 115% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 77.2 91% 163 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 118%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 112GB free Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 78 123 78 86 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 364 Write 367 Mixed 296 SusWrite 121 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 21.1 102% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 32 78% 159 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	67% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 21 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 14.3 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 7R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	39%	31	258	141	75	33.1"	1707 960	AOC3279 Q3279WG5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,296x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,134x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	135x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	563x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	308x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	266x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	181x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	134x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	126x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	91x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	81x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 6,228 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16