Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 03:10
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$132
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 156
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 239
29% 224 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 73.5
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 63.5
60% 68.7 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 62.5
52% 63 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$46
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 137 137 135 131 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 417
Write 163
Mixed 196
SusWrite 138
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 30.9
122% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 162
153% 244 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 128%
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
21GB free
Firmware: 1000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 270 266 259 276 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 407
Write 270
Mixed 227
SusWrite 245
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 13.3
93% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 84.7
103% 176 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
162GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 43 39 41 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 99.8
Write 30.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 42.1
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2800C16-4GRR F4-2800C16-4GRR Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.4% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 109 7 60 31.5" 1920 1080 TCL0000 32S331
Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $536
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback