Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512DA
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191224
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 13:37
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 23,686 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 190 62% 114 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 502 49% 400 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 1821) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 19.6 11% 14.6 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 14.8 Splatting 10.5 10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 387GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 824 49 101 68 96 60 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 954 Write 914 Mixed 853 SusWrite 200 163% 730 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 54.3 178% 67.8 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 500 DQ Mixed 400 303% 399 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 185%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C1J SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 142 142 142 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 138 Write 144 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 141 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.6 258% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	74.4% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 25.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 23.2 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	17%	6	8	5	60	15.5"	1280 720	BOE07F1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	404x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	94x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	41x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	405x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	94x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	41x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	189x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	77x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	66x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	90x
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 55%, 2,394 samples	84x
HMA851S6CJR6N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBHynixBench 51%, 539 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16