Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer PI411
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210607
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 12,809 User benchmarks, average bench 78% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Memory 81.3 1-Core 158 2-Core 307 98% 182 Pts	4-Core 602 8-Core 1,051 100% 826 Pts	64-Core 1,314 81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Device(1A58 2014) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.6.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.7% Poor	Lighting 26.6 Reflection 119 Parallax 35.5 22% 60.3 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 28.8 Splatting 23.8 19% 22.5 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB 9,396 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1802 1536 1514 1463 1433 1427 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 2476 Write 2,426 Mixed 1,895 SusWrite 1,529 468% 2,082 MB/s	4K Read 61.1 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 83.1 272% 94.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,162 DQ Write 913 DQ Mixed 1026 771% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 355%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB 2,443 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 67GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 566 563 485 557 566 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 547 Write 356 Mixed 398 SusWrite 528 103% 457 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 26.9 95% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 296 207% 266 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB 20,634 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	71% Very good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 25.3 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 26.9 SC Write 41.5 SC Mixed 31 95% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	144	14"	1280 720	SHP1523 LQ140M1JW49

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900HXAMDBench 78%, 12,809 samples	455x

GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	188x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	169x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	65x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	280x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	111x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	18x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	293x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16