Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 17:38
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 492
60% 452 Pts
64-Core 678
46% 678 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 2011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 93.6
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 98.5
76% 96.2 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 92.9
Splatting 84.9
80% 103 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 93%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.6
4% 7.23 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.2
6% 9.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,769
Write 1,324
Mixed 634
274% 1,243 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.4
197% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 767
583% 795 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 258%
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
211GB free
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1894 974 763 763 777 786 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1928
Write 1,907
Mixed 1501
SusWrite 993
355% 1,582 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 73.3
239% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 860
667% 919 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 254%
Great: 292%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 56: 10R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 21% 56 315 257 60 27" 2048 1152 BNQ7F76 BenQ EX2780Q
History: Score 38: 4R 4G 6B | Score 61: 7R 7G 5B | Score 56: 10R 2G 0B
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $245Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback