Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 31.3 1-Core 67 2-Core 126 40% 74.7 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 395 38% 313 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 30 Parallax 43.9 24% 34.6 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 43.7 Splatting 43.4 34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB 6,470 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 54 57 24 11 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 1,285 Write 874 Mixed 794 SusWrite 104 169% 764 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 46.3 152% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 221 191% 283 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 200%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 379GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 114 115 117 112 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 54.8 Write 75 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 114 57% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FRS Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 13.2 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 12.8 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 247 16% 247 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	5%	20	97	26	120	15.5"	1536 864	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,835x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	978x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,359x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	946x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	507x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,156x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	404x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	587x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	376x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	135x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16