Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 20:58
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 150
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 290
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
EVGA(3842 3651) 2GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 20.9
13% 17.7 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 15.5
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 68 78 106 58 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 347
Write 157
Mixed 201
SusWrite 76.2
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 13.8
68% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 15.3
26% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 72%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$89
308GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 358 341 339 337 357 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 389
Write 359
Mixed 313
SusWrite 340
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 41.7
135% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45.4
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 61.2
52% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 137%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
139GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 17.4
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 18.5
27% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.5
133% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 3R 4G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 24% 80 149 83 60 24.5" 1920 1080 IVM6132 PL2530H
History: Score 32: 3R 4G 5B | Score 39: 3R 4G 12B
Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback