Biostar TA970 Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TA970 Plus  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150130
Uptime26 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 19:55
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 124
53% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 316
33% 266 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 31.6
20% 27.1 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 22.6
19% 23 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1960G 960GB
643GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 231 239 235 256 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 373
Write 381
Mixed 295
SusWrite 248
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 10.7
58% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 43.1
64% 116 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
117GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 138 147 111 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 103
Write 92.1
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 118
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 933 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 5R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 13% 98 186 133 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACI249A ASUS VS247
History: Score 28: 2R 4G 6B | Score 40: 4R 4G 8B | Score 39: 5R 3G 5B
Typical TA970 Plus Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA970 Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback