Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH551
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200720
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 05:13
Run Duration	339 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 61.8 2-Core 122 54% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 504 44% 373 Pts	64-Core 704 44% 704 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2009) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.01% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 60 Parallax 4.1 3% 22.4 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 3.4 Splatting 5.1 4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.01% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB 4,252 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 599 599 595 562 586 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 1,630 Write 1573 Mixed 1322 SusWrite 597 287% 1,280 MB/s	4K Read 47.5 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 53.8 178% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 598 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 387 298% 416 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 297%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 13: 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
13%	22%	23	310	234	300	15.5"	1280 720	AUODE8E

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 13: 1R 2G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	1,302x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	504x
RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 93%, 3,436 samples	396x
RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 86%, 3,561 samples	379x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	311x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	202x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	148x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	651x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	172x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16