Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181106
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7640X-$66 2,123 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 96.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 311 103% 188 Pts	4-Core 596 8-Core 611 80% 604 Pts	64-Core 605 37% 605 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 377E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	106% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 146 Parallax 136 108% 138 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 146 Splatting 124 106% 129 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,570 Write 1983 Mixed 1,491 446% 2,015 MB/s	4K Read 70.2 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 94.5 315% 110 MB/s	DQ Read 1,507 DQ Write 1,095 DQ Mixed 1,229 938% 1,277 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 96GB free Firmware: SBFMP1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 436 447 213 195 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 201 Write 104 Mixed 86 SusWrite 296 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 20.9 4K Mixed 12 57% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 98%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$39 1,967 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 31GB free Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 136 136 136 137 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1,186 Write 501 Mixed 728 SusWrite 149 141% 641 MB/s	4K Read 71.7 4K Write 187 4K Mixed 90.3 323% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 411 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 168 168% 274 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 165%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 347GB free Firmware: 01.01S01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 90 90 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 90.2 Write 87.8 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 90.2 66% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 4x4GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 33.1 104% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 39 SC Mixed 29.3 86% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 52.1 77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	27"	1280 720	DELA057 DELL U2711

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	38x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	22x
Core i9-7940XIntel $654Bench 83%, 4,560 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	9x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	8x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	5x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $775

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)