Asrock B450M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 10:51
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 232
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 658
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 510.31
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 37.4
29% 37.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 26.6
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 603 363 329 311 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,816
Write 1,128
Mixed 1,165
SusWrite 372
249% 1,120 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 40.6
128% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 747
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 555
414% 558 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 160%
Great: 309%
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
44GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 129 131 262 135 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 186
Write 85.9
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 174
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 10.5
41% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
928GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 0 4.8 3.5 3 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 126
Write 24.2
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 2.9
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
393GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 150 154 158 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 13.9
Write 113
Mixed 20
SusWrite 155
54% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
55% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 23 22 26 24 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 93.2
Write 45.2
Mixed 53
SusWrite 22
64% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
94% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 29.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 18.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 8,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $524
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback