HP 500-008er

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-008er  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 22:40
Run Duration361 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 99.8
45% 73 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 101
13% 99.1 Pts
64-Core 95.5
6% 95.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10.8
7% 9.4 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 6.5
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
920GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 147 155 129 148 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 169
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 148
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 Elpida EBJ20UF8BDW0-GN-F 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback