Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HQ 33,920 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 69.8 1-Core 82.9 2-Core 172 62% 108 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 456 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1000M 6,377 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Legend(17AA 222E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Lighting 14.7 Reflection 16.4 Parallax 15.7 12% 15.6 fps	MRender 21.6 Gravity 17 Splatting 14.6 14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU A 256GB 985 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: JYLA1102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 323 248 230 248 259 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 342 Write 306 Mixed 326 SusWrite 277 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 8.3 44% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 338 247% 321 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB 4,393 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 23.1 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 21.8 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6820HQIntelBench 60%, 33,920 samples	2x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	1x

SSD
THNSFJ256GDNU A 256GBToshibaBench 73%, 985 samples	2x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,393 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16