Performance Results


Gaming 152% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 137% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201021
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '21 at 05:36
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$153 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Memory 92 1-Core 166 2-Core 307 103% 188 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 879 87% 712 Pts	64-Core 984 61% 984 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650 20,197 User benchmarks, average bench 171% AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.11.1 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	156% Outstanding	Lighting 190 Reflection 230 Parallax 388 154% 269 fps	MRender 350 Gravity 146 Splatting 247 201% 248 fps
Poor: 165% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 178%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 227 211 207 198 195 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 492 Write 339 Mixed 278 SusWrite 218 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 33.8 128% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 171 136% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 510GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 59GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 399 395 380 392 336 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 456 Write 417 Mixed 310 SusWrite 385 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 27.4 80% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 102 96% 145 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 115%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2336 2344 2338 2353 2315 844 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	371% Outstanding	Read 2,341 Write 2,267 Mixed 2,136 SusWrite 2,088 498% 2,208 MB/s	4K Read 67.9 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 93 303% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,365 DQ Write 1,145 DQ Mixed 1,248 937% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 371% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB 4,937 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 35.8 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 29.2 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 35.2 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16