Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 48.3 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 91.4 37% 61.8 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB 2,750 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 358 137 129 129 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 398 Write 358 Mixed 316 SusWrite 209 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 10.9 87% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 34.7 71% 143 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS8266.C8FG 1x4GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x

SSD
256GB SSD 256GBForeseeBench 79%, 1,745 samples	2x
128GB SSD 128GBForeseeBench 59%, 2,750 samples	1x
SSD 64GBBiwinBench 52%, 114 samples	1x

RAM
FD4AS3200C8GTG 1x8GBUnknownBench 33%, 3 samples	1x
SNK4S268GCND4-KN 1x8GBUnknownBench 26%, 1 sample	1x
CT4G4SFS8266.C8FG 1x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 34 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16