Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171019
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '21 at 09:24
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 125 2-Core 252 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 810 78% 641 Pts	64-Core 1068 66% 1068 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.8% Very good	Lighting 89.4 Reflection 104 Parallax 92.6 73% 95.2 fps	MRender 86.2 Gravity 89.2 Splatting 90.5 73% 88.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 71 66 70 60 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 413 Write 395 Mixed 342 SusWrite 124 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 47.4 161% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 344 260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 104GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1402 1189 1073 458 334 308 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 1,689 Write 1,650 Mixed 668 SusWrite 794 268% 1,200 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 50.4 203% 84.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,500 DQ Write 1169 DQ Mixed 1,041 859% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 636GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 1141 1142 1097 1071 1111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,062 Write 1,071 Mixed 1,046 SusWrite 1,104 242% 1071 MB/s	4K Read 53 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 81.7 268% 96.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,376 DQ Write 1,004 DQ Mixed 1,152 871% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 19.9 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 21.5 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	537x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	497x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	425x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	562x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	511x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	472x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,005

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16