Asrock Z97 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140604
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 01 '17 at 06:43
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$207
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
79% 133 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 547
58% 452 Pts
64-Core 554
37% 554 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 6.19
Parallax 6.34
3% 5.47 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2853 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 198
Parallax 191
134% 183 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 181
Splatting 120
79% 143 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 128%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$78
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 406
Mixed 409
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 44
174% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 111
139% 248 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
426GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 148
Write 147
Mixed 146
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.22
81% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST2000DM001-9YN164 4TB
392GB free
Firmware: SC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 90.4
Write 93.3
Mixed 67.4
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.19
76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
81GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 136
Mixed 145
109% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.19
64% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
63GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 23.6
Mixed 26.1
35% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.73
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.94
126% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z97 OC Formula Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,007
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback