Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 15:47
Run Duration1228 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 168
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 437
46% 370 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 64
52% 66.1 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 53.5
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 347 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 447
Write 310
Mixed 385
SusWrite 113
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 26.9
103% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 70.8
DQ Mixed 221
160% 215 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
754GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 386 272 268 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 392
Write 423
Mixed 341
SusWrite 198
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 26.9
92% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 236
167% 215 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 104%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
618GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 1327 1412 1327 1248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,327
Write 1,388
Mixed 737
SusWrite 886
243% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 28.9
104% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 172
123% 164 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 146%
Great: 354%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.4 183 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 110
Write 132
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 60.9
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.7
226% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 114%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
749GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 109 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 131
Write 126
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 36.1
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2 - $183

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $831
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback