Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300-$172 660 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 82.6 43% 65.8 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 148 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M HP(103C 3610) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.3 2% 1 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.43 fps

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4004RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 137 83 91 84 86 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 234 Write 202 Mixed 144 SusWrite 109 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 11.8 50% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 60 DQ Mixed 34.5 38% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	7x
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	3x
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9600M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 3,959 samples	12x
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 2%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 480GBSanDisk $40Bench 53%, 16,752 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $60

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16