Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 126
58% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 334
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 25.7
14% 21.2 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 14
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 143 154 155 146 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 280
Write 211
Mixed 241
SusWrite 154
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 35.4
121% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 158
124% 169 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 85%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
93GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 332 332 308 314 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 427
Write 315
Mixed 103
SusWrite 317
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 11.4
49% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 13.9
13% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
158GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 326 326 330 338 336 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 434
Write 330
Mixed 255
SusWrite 326
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 13.9
89% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 82.2
91% 153 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback