Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100820
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '17 at 02:57
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 K 655 401 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 50 2-Core 92.5 43% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 170 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% XFX(1682 3004) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 2.53 4% 3.74 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 4.17 Splatting 2.13 2% 2.99 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12144 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1254 (B1) Unknown 97 97 74 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 64 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1040 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13074929065	50.3% Above average	Read 230 Write 221 Mixed 204 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 17.7 85% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 78.9 DQ Mixed 20.5 25% 43 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 116%
USB2.0 USB Flash Drive 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.86% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 6.42 Mixed 9.62 14% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.09 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.86% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 11.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H55M-UD2H Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	53x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	53x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	45x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	78x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	70x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16