Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 88 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 84.9 49% 73 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 118 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0005) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.22% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.1 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.22% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMM02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 240 281 305 248 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 396 Write 427 Mixed 310 SusWrite 273 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 28.9 98% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 198 156% 217 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 169GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 176 203 215 174 201 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.5% Good	Read 234 Write 222 Mixed 213 SusWrite 194 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 33.1 100% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 189 143% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 134%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 20GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 11 13 13 11 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 86.5 Write 30.1 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 14.3 49% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.4 127% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 1.4 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	111x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	28x

SSD
THNSNC128GMLJ 128GBToshibaBench 31%, 189 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
THNSNC256GBSJ 256GBToshibaBench 36%, 267 samples	5x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $34

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16