| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Studio XPS 435MT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0R849J |
| Memory | 20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091221 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 24 '22 at 06:58 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.2%
Good
|
60% 97.5 Pts
|
38% 300 Pts
|
21% 337 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21.3%
Poor
|
21% 31.1 fps
|
21% 26.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 197 201 193 206 205 MB/s
|
48.7%
Average
|
46% 206 MB/s
|
78% 21.6 MB/s
|
38% 52.8 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
631GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 108 106 MB/s
|
51.2%
Above average
|
58% 78.4 MB/s
|
180% 1.4 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA MK2035GSS 200GB
99GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
36% 26.2 MB/s
|
52% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.8%
Below average
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
28% 9.67 GB/s
|
54% 73.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 319 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 268x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 18x |
| Xeon W3580IntelBench 72%, 653 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 17x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 13x |
| Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $199 |