Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150709
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 18:52
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$132
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 374
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.7% Below average
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 50.8
31% 44.3 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 39
Splatting 31.4
30% 38.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 382
Mixed 273
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 44
154% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 167
169% 274 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
337GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 141 138 137 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 173
Write 174
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 139
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 109%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 320GB
114GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 109 117 165 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 167
Write 168
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 138
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 131%
TrekStor DS maxi Xpress 1TB
160GB free, PID 0039
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 48.6
Write 43.9
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 64.4
69% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.4% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 20.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $462
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback