PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20190219 |
Uptime | 26.2 Days |
Run Date | May 11 '22 at 16:05 |
Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
91.4%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 215 208 196 199 301 MB/s
|
88.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
140GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 109 113 113 113 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 355x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 351x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $459Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 181x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 100x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 90x |
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 77x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $576 |