Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 93.7 43% 69.2 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 266 28% 221 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 281 Write 291 Mixed 261 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 13.6 66% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 48.2 DQ Mixed 13.8 17% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 134%
Seagate BUP Slim GD 2TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 336GB free, PID ab26 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 58.4 Write 127 Mixed 26.6 95% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.57 4K Write 4.84 4K Mixed 0.59 190% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 50%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 642 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 288GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 72.7 Write 102 Mixed 57.2 102% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.3 61% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1866 4x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.8 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 4.7 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16