PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 30.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 30.6GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 8740w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1520 |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 30.5625 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20151110 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 07 '17 at 21:13 |
Run Duration | 95 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 2800M
HP(103C 1520) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.0
|
3.08%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 30GB
null MHz
4096, 27200 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 30x |
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples | 21x |
Core i7 M 640IntelBench 43%, 5,045 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro FX 2800MNvidiaBench 5%, 1,135 samples | 80x |
Quadro FX 3800MNvidiaBench 7%, 388 samples | 25x |
Mobility Radeon HD 5870AMDBench 9%, 3,040 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $245 |