| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110728 |
| Uptime | 12.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 05 '22 at 09:00 |
| Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.5%
Very good
|
69% 114 Pts
|
40% 297 Pts
|
18% 293 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280-$185
MSI(1462 277C) 3GB
CLim: 972 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
|
31.1%
Below average
|
34% 44.1 fps
|
25% 31.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427BNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 102 172 186 118 147 MB/s
|
41.2%
Average
|
36% 163 MB/s
|
71% 23.1 MB/s
|
30% 41.2 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
551GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 152 149 150 151 150 MB/s
|
82.3%
Excellent
|
90% 123 MB/s
|
209% 1.6 MB/s
| |
|
ADATA HV320 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a86a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 17 19 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
22% 16.8 MB/s
|
76% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
48.4%
Average
|
49% 17.3 GB/s
|
28% 9.87 GB/s
|
63% 63.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 65x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 45x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
| 850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |