PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-D3 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130125 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 13 '22 at 12:43 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
58.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 63 58 51 52 51 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 74 74 73 68 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905584-032.A KHX1600C9D3/4 9905584-032.A KHX1600C9D3/4 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 89x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 61x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 52x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $465 |